So. NPR characterizes the Obamacare/Sebelius contraceptives regulation as follows:
This past week, President Barack Obama offered a compromise to his controversial requirement that faith-based institutions provide contraception in employee health plans. Under the new rules, religiously affiliated employers will not be required to offer free contraceptive coverage. Churches were already exempt. Instead, insurance companies would have to offer and pay for contraception.The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, while a bit wobbly at first, has now firmed up and declared the mandate to be a "nationwide government coercion of religious people and groups to sell, broker or purchase 'services' to which they have a moral or religious objection," and "an unprecedented attack on religious liberty."
Last week, while some in the liberal press were heaping praise on Obama as the Great Compromiser, I was scratching my head. I never saw a "compromise" in the proposed regulations; the only shift I saw in the requirement to provide free contraceptives was in pocketbooks -- providing contraceptives moved from the employer's own purse to the employer's checkbook as he writes a check for insurance premiums, then to the insurer's pocketbook which is filled as he cashes the premium check, whose amount has gone up to cover the insurer's "hidden" increased costs. Everyone will still have access to "free" contraceptives; however, we must bear in mind, as my Daddy taught me -- there is no free lunch. Anywhere. Ever.
When the headlines and pundits were screaming that Obama had won, and brokered a "save" for his mandate, there had been no actual "save." There had not been any distinctive change at all to Government's dictate that we all not only purchase insurance, but that we also purchase insurance that covers what Government decrees. Contraceptives will still be paid for by everyone through their premiums, even if they're not broken out by line item. Trust me on this one.
Did some people actually believe that, simply because there will not be birth control vending machines onsite at workplaces, those employers and employees won't be paying for them anyway?
I really don't have a dog in this hunt because I'm not terribly passionate about reproductive issues. But -- come on, people!!!!! Listen, and think!!! This is little more than the next step by progressive liberals in their quest to protect us all because they know what's best for everyone, and simple people shouldn't be burdened with having to make their own decisions and choices. And simple people certainly shouldn't be influenced by religious views because religion tends to be a little too steely in its dogma, and simple people certainly shouldn't be snookered into making a decision based on what their churches teach them.
The Supreme Court cannot hear the challenge to this whole tyrannical scheme too soon to suit me, but how much money will have been wasted, how many tears shed, and how much more divided will the nation be by the time an opinion is rendered?
If we still have a nation.
Sorry. Today is a doom and gloom day.
Ironically, Jesus and His disciples would not qualify for the ObamaCare religious exemption - they served people of all faiths but the "exemption" only exists if an institution serves ONLY those of the same faith.
ReplyDeleteYeah, PH. I wonder how that works for the exempted unions?
ReplyDeleteHmmm. Gub'mint-mandated contraception. Well, I don't have a dog in this fight, either. But I'm in favor of the gub'mint providing me with a NEED for contraception. Like say, once a week at that shack outside LaGrange. Vouchers.
ReplyDelete"Jes lemmee know... if ya wanna go..."
Vouchers. Heh.
ReplyDelete